I can't admit that it was the actual reason for us to take the leap to do a gut renovation, however I will readily admit that we spent (and still spend!) hours and hours, probably years, watching a variety of HGTV and DIY network programs that inspire us to continue with our project in Brooklyn.
While we are inspired, most of these shows also leave us frustrated.
It's no fault of the networks, since we assume they are trying to capture the average audience, but frustration is usually immediate with prices. I understand that NYC is an expensive place to live but there are some issues when we watch the show:
- Home prices are often the amount of our down payment. Yes, this is the why most NYCers don't purchase, but watching someone buy a five thousand square foot luxury home for $300k with no indication of income is frustrating. For us years of working 18+ hours a day allowed us to earn downpayment for a Brooklyn home... $300k though? That would be maybe a two-hour commute from this awesome city and something not in our consideration.
- Permits are at significantly high prices for almost everything in NYC except for cosmetic changes like wall paint color. Want to move your bathroom? Fah-getta-bout-it.
- Unless you are as fortunate as us to buy an entire building (rare) in NYC, then you also have to spend time and money to have the board of the condo/coop building to approve your plans
We are so early on in our construction but remain scared reading other experiences. Please reach out with comments- both if you have questions or went through similar experiences.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Second Opinions: Be Aware of Your Engineering Requests
The irony of this this post is that I come from a family of engineers. I never thought that I would complain about them or their intent, however after recent experience I do have to share the following disclaimers:
Do not automatically trust the opinion of an engineer.
This is probably common sense, or should be, but again, this is a blog written by novices.
Recently we were researching with our contractor whether or not it would be necessary for us to reinforce the existing foundation of our house, considering that it was 100 years old and we would be adding an additional story.
Our initial meeting with the engineer was pre-closure with the bank. As previously mentioned, our house purchase was through a 203k loan, and being such we had to have several inspections of the home, most importantly to prove that the house was capable of withstanding a gut renovation.
At this time, we were told with a signed paper that the house was indeed capable to withstand extensive renovation.
Flash forward four months later when we start to consider whether we will need any structural improvement. We consult the same engineer and suddenly receive a very different opinion. Suddenly we need to consult him for much more detailed plans and decide to dig into our foundation to replace pilings that 'might' be deteriorated to a cost of close to $45k.
Should we?
Shouldn't we?
We are not engineers. We are first-time homeowners. We have barely been responsible for the gas and electric cost at our previous residences so how are we supposed to know what should be paid in a situation like this?
In this type of situation we actually relied heavily upon on our contractor and his experience. We were readily told how manipulative the engineers' requests could be - not of our particular engineer but in general. And again, being from a family of engineers I mean no offense of anyone in particular.
Still I would like to point out that it is a good idea to get an engineer to inspect your home if you plan to do extensive renovation.
In our personal experience, certain signs (for example our floors were slanted left to right, but we had structure issues from front to back) are not imminent proof that you need structural work.
However, to date we have decided not to do any additional exploratory work of the wood pilings in our foundation. I hope that this will not be a regret of ours, but I have to admit, there is much more ahead of us to be concerned with...
Do not automatically trust the opinion of an engineer.
This is probably common sense, or should be, but again, this is a blog written by novices.
Recently we were researching with our contractor whether or not it would be necessary for us to reinforce the existing foundation of our house, considering that it was 100 years old and we would be adding an additional story.
Our initial meeting with the engineer was pre-closure with the bank. As previously mentioned, our house purchase was through a 203k loan, and being such we had to have several inspections of the home, most importantly to prove that the house was capable of withstanding a gut renovation.
At this time, we were told with a signed paper that the house was indeed capable to withstand extensive renovation.
Flash forward four months later when we start to consider whether we will need any structural improvement. We consult the same engineer and suddenly receive a very different opinion. Suddenly we need to consult him for much more detailed plans and decide to dig into our foundation to replace pilings that 'might' be deteriorated to a cost of close to $45k.
Should we?
Shouldn't we?
We are not engineers. We are first-time homeowners. We have barely been responsible for the gas and electric cost at our previous residences so how are we supposed to know what should be paid in a situation like this?
In this type of situation we actually relied heavily upon on our contractor and his experience. We were readily told how manipulative the engineers' requests could be - not of our particular engineer but in general. And again, being from a family of engineers I mean no offense of anyone in particular.
Still I would like to point out that it is a good idea to get an engineer to inspect your home if you plan to do extensive renovation.
In our personal experience, certain signs (for example our floors were slanted left to right, but we had structure issues from front to back) are not imminent proof that you need structural work.
However, to date we have decided not to do any additional exploratory work of the wood pilings in our foundation. I hope that this will not be a regret of ours, but I have to admit, there is much more ahead of us to be concerned with...
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Utilities: Actual versus Estimated
Here is some advice for every new homeowner, which is probably far more obvious to most than it was to us.
When we were close to closing, I brought up utilities to our lawyer, because I was concerned over responsibility. "You only pay for what is incurred after closing," was the response, which made perfect sense to me. I didn't question it much more.
It is not the fault of my lawyer, but I should have questioned it more.
And after my experience, my advice is very simple:
Take pictures of your meters at closing.
Every one.
I can write all of this happily now, after "fighting" for the past couple of months with utility companies since closing, but I feel most of what I went through can be easily avoided with a few simple steps.
Like most, I called all of the utility companies to set up our accounts after we closed. In some cases, it was a little more complicated since the house that we bought was a two-family - meaning two utility accounts in some cases.
What I didn't account for was that the previous owner hadn't allowed meter readings from any utility company for three years.
Because of this, all meter readings had been estimated at very incorrect levels...
I'm not sure how it is in other parts of the country, or other parts of the world, but in NYC, meters are usually fairly accessible in large apartment buildings, because the "super" will allow access. However, in other smaller residential units (small apartments or townhomes/brownstones), utility meters are often inside, even in basements, and not as easily accesible to public inspection. When access is not granted, the utility company bills based on estimates.
Thankfully, right after closing, I took pictures of our meters. I am so glad that I did. Our utilities are handled by several sources: Con Ed, National Grid, DEP.
Certain utilities (like water) were taken care of at closing, but others were actually left fairly ambiguous. To make it a happier story, to date, we have not paid for anything we did not owe, but we easily could have, so I would caution others to be aware.
Fortunately, I knew to be aware of the "estimated" versus "actual" reading bills. But I can easily see how someone could not pay attention for months and get themselves into trouble.
Meter readings - you should learn how to read them and take pictures. Then contact the companies.
For other utility companies, they insist on coming in person.
While most New Yorkers can guess the company, I won't name them, but they say they will come between 7:00am and 6:30pm and give you a 30 minute "warning call" to let you know that they are own their way....
Many don't realize it can take more than 30 minutes to get from one part of Manhattan to another, never mind from one borough to another... Never mind we are working...
That is a vent for another time....
While not time-sensitive, another issue for us is that we have two sets of meters in some cases because the house was set up as a two-family. We will definitely be posting on the process to convert the meters to one set as our process continues...
Insurance: What is it good for?
Homeowner's insurance. How easy, right? I mean, you see dozens of commercials each month, even on basic channels, advertising different providers of home insurance.
It may be easy to some, but to us, insurance was something fairly new and complicated. We only knew one type of insurance. Well, to put all cards on the table, I suppose we knew two types: Health insurance and renter's insurance. The first was pretty much a necessity, and the latter was something we always speculated about and never actually committed ourselves to sign up for.
Even as novice first-time home buyers, we knew we would need home insurance. However, that was the extent of what we knew. We knew it was necessary, even beyond the bank's closing requirements. However, even though our financing bank we would be doing extensive demolition of the home, they didn't specify their home insurance requirements- they really seemed to only want proof of some type of insurance.
I was very honest with the first few providers I called to get quotes. I recounted what type of work would be done to the home and immediately was told that they didn't provide insurance for homes in that condition.
Call after call.
Referral after referral.
We finally found out what we needed: Builder's Insurance and Liability Insurance.
"Obviously", some might say. Well, how were we to know? We are pretty sophisticated "googlers" and not even then could we get a clear answer.
I called the bank after hearing this and tried to confirm with them - would they accept these two insurances in lieu of traditional "homeowner's insurance". They confirmed that they simply needed to validate "insurance" and this would be fine.
I won't explicitly give numbers, as the point of this blog is to be more informational than financial, but I can affirm that these insurance policies are far more expensive than traditional homeowner's insurance. By "far more", I mean considerably more. And by considerably more, I mean... Well, how to put it into perspective. Traditional homeowner's insurance seemed to be "X" amount. This insurance was multiples more.
I guess this protected us against the home falling down, or someone walking into our demolished home and hurting themselves?
Regardless of what this policy provides, I feel it proves what most say when they start construction. Take what you think it will cost, add 30%, and if it comes in around there, feel thankful.
And we are just at the beginning. :)
It may be easy to some, but to us, insurance was something fairly new and complicated. We only knew one type of insurance. Well, to put all cards on the table, I suppose we knew two types: Health insurance and renter's insurance. The first was pretty much a necessity, and the latter was something we always speculated about and never actually committed ourselves to sign up for.
Even as novice first-time home buyers, we knew we would need home insurance. However, that was the extent of what we knew. We knew it was necessary, even beyond the bank's closing requirements. However, even though our financing bank we would be doing extensive demolition of the home, they didn't specify their home insurance requirements- they really seemed to only want proof of some type of insurance.
I was very honest with the first few providers I called to get quotes. I recounted what type of work would be done to the home and immediately was told that they didn't provide insurance for homes in that condition.
Call after call.
Referral after referral.
We finally found out what we needed: Builder's Insurance and Liability Insurance.
"Obviously", some might say. Well, how were we to know? We are pretty sophisticated "googlers" and not even then could we get a clear answer.
I called the bank after hearing this and tried to confirm with them - would they accept these two insurances in lieu of traditional "homeowner's insurance". They confirmed that they simply needed to validate "insurance" and this would be fine.
I won't explicitly give numbers, as the point of this blog is to be more informational than financial, but I can affirm that these insurance policies are far more expensive than traditional homeowner's insurance. By "far more", I mean considerably more. And by considerably more, I mean... Well, how to put it into perspective. Traditional homeowner's insurance seemed to be "X" amount. This insurance was multiples more.
I guess this protected us against the home falling down, or someone walking into our demolished home and hurting themselves?
Regardless of what this policy provides, I feel it proves what most say when they start construction. Take what you think it will cost, add 30%, and if it comes in around there, feel thankful.
And we are just at the beginning. :)
Demolition Part Deux
The following pictures represent the true state of demolition. For all those who question what parts of the house we might keep or what we could salvage... Well, I think these pictures pretty much represent what we are salvaging. In fact, not even entirely, since we intend to replace a lot of the beams as well.
The beauty of completely renovating a house is that you have the personal knowledge of what age and quality of materials will be hidden in your walls. This is both a blessing and a curse. Knowing everything is brand new and installed to your standards is of course a fantastic comfort. The fear of what it will take to get there, and the cost, however, is something else entirely.
At this point, we can still smile and be optimistic. Only a handful of checks have been written, after all.
Tonight I brought a very dear, close friend of mine to visit the property. It was the first time she had actually seen the house as she lives in Hoboken and we often catch up in Manhattan. I wish she had seen it before this state, but in actuality, post-demolition is almost an easier state to explain our visions.
We sat on the only surface available at the moment: a wooden board balanced over a few floor joists at the entrance of the house. On this shoddy surface we sat in dust and shared a bottle of wine while I showed her once again our floor plans. This time, in the raw space, the floor plans made sense. She looked around and gave me some great advice. "Next time you feel stressed, or that it might not happen," she said, "come back here, even as it is now, look around, and tell yourself what you just told me, and it will remind you why you are doing this and why it is worth it." Thank you, Annie. That is the reason I share your smile in the picture below.
Friday, March 1, 2013
Demolition Photos.... Part 1
After closing, the road to demolition was a short one.
In any case, when mentioning the gut renovation to friends and family, and indicating our anxiety concerning the project, we were met with common responses - Couldn't we save some of the wood floors? Couldn't some of the plumbing still be used? Maybe some old materials can be salvaged?
I'll let the following pictures do their own speaking. This was mid-demolition in the middle of January 2013:
Many people don't understand the concept of a gut renovation, even if they think that they do. Even I had to be reminded by my husband several times. Sometimes I would make a comment or ask a question that would make him simply roll his eyes. He somehow understood from the start what it meant. I thought I did; however, it was not until I saw the property after demolition that it really hit me!
To back up for a minute, I should mention that we did some "demolition" of our own when we first closed. The last "renovation" of this 1910 home had been when drop-down ceilings were all the rage, and we were anxious to gauge the true height of the ceilings in the home. In one evening of inspecting our newly purchased home, we took down a couple rooms' worth of drop-down ceilings and were very pleased to find the pre-war construction high ceilings that we expected.
In any case, when mentioning the gut renovation to friends and family, and indicating our anxiety concerning the project, we were met with common responses - Couldn't we save some of the wood floors? Couldn't some of the plumbing still be used? Maybe some old materials can be salvaged?
I'll let the following pictures do their own speaking. This was mid-demolition in the middle of January 2013:
To come shortly - the pictures when demolition was recently completed in the first week of February 2013.
Labels:
203k,
brooklyn,
Demolition,
greenpoint,
Gut Reno,
Gut Renovation,
nyc
The Road to Closing & Closing Costs
Our original closing date was August 15, 2012. We did not
close until December 7, 2012. A variety of issues contributed to this delay.
The first delay was on our part. The original contractor
that we wished to use did not meet all of the bank’s requirements and was also
hesitant of the 203(k) process, with all of its rules and regulations.
Therefore, after submitting all of the paperwork and forms for this contractor,
we wound up having to repeat the process with another contractor.
The next delays were due to the homeowners. The two-family
home had been owned by the same family for decades, and the title was in the
names of an older gentleman and his mother. Unfortunately, both were not in
good health. The mother had been sick for a while, apparently suffering from
dementia, and was in a nursing home. The son had recently been diagnosed with
an terminal illness but had deteriorated quickly; soon after we signed a
contract, he was also placed in a medical facility.
This house was a two-family home, and we soon learned that a
third, unrelated party was living in one of the units. We also soon learned
that this man had no intention of vacating the property. After all, why should
he? He was living for free, had no lease, and the owner of the home was
indisposed at another location.
To make a long story short, after applying a lot of
pressure, threatening to back out due to breach of contract (which stated there
were no tenants), we were assured that the man was vacating. However, he
refused to leave until he secured a lease elsewhere in the city. On top of
this, forget the “broom clean” clause in the contract, the owners of the home
left a considerable amount of junk and debris behind.
In the end, it worked out. The “tenant” vacated and we
closed on the home. Thanks to our lawyer (thankfully we chose a great lawyer
for closing) the homeowners had signed an agreement to pay us if certain
conditions weren’t met. For example, daily charges if someone was still living
there after closing, money held in escrow to ensure the place was cleaned out,
etc. As they hadn’t cleaned out the place, we were able to get a bit more money
from them. Additionally, we were demolition the place – after we picked out
some semi-interesting “treasures” from the junk left behind, we planned to have
the rest removed with demolition.
In a way, I’m not sure what was more difficult – the closing
process, or paying for the closing….
Should I state the obvious? New York City is expensive. For
a reason that sometimes only we understand, we pay more for just about
everything (except property taxes!) so it is no surprise that closing costs are
a significant expense to factor in when buying or selling a home.
One of the key reasons that closing costs are higher is the
higher price of real estate. To give you an idea, our closing costs were 3.1%
of the sale price of the home (excluding the cost of renovations). The NYS
Mortgage Tax/Transfer Tax was 68% of this alone. In addition to this, there
was, of course, the downpayment to the bank. Despite being an FHA loan, which
typically requires a very low downpayment, we actually paid around 20% down
because of the size of our loan including the renovation costs. The downpayment
wasn’t too painful at closing since we had already been required to put down
10% when we went into contract, which is customary in NYC.
The other additional cost was that of our lawyer. I’ve heard
prices quoted from friends outside of the city that are a fraction of what we
paid, and I’ve also heard of the bank actually providing a lawyer at
closing. This was not the case for us,
but we were very happy with our lawyer and would definitely recommend him. It
was more expensive than we originally anticipated, but that original
expectation was based on a closing date in August. Since we took four months
longer and there were some road bumps along the way (illegal tenant, anyone?),
the price was understandable.
While the cost of closing was high, we were prepared for it,
and I give credit to our bank in that regard. Wells Fargo’s “Good Faith
Estimate” was well aligned with the costs incurred at closing, and everything
was well explained. In any case, it is always important to do your due
diligence and read everything twice (or ten times). For example, we were
refunded a small chunk of change after closing from insurance that had been
pre-paid at closing; since we obtained our own insurance independently and
showed proof of this, this pre-payment was swiftly returned to us.
Financing and FHA 203k Loans
After doing a lot of research, and reading many different
experiences, we decided to finance with a 203(k) loan, also known as a “Rehab
Loan”. For more information, here is the official website:
Basically, with a 203(k), you obtain loan larger than your
traditional mortgage, because you are also financing the cost of renovating
your home. It’s not as straightforward as your typical mortgage, and there is a
lot of paperwork involved. It also isn’t as simple as closing on your home and
getting a big fat check for the renovations needed.
The money for the renovations is held in escrow, and there
is a detailed list of specific items for which the money is reserved. For
example $X,XXX is specifically for floors, or plumbing, or demolition/clean-up,
etc. An HUD consultant visits the home and does a thorough documented
inspection before closing in order to produce the “Work Write-Up” (WWU) to
detail what repairs will take place and at what cost.
Once repairs/renovations are underway, the same HUD
consultant returns periodically to do further inspections. When progress is
made, you receive payment from the bank from the escrow account through the
draw process. A small portion of money is held until the end of the renovation,
when they sign off that everything is complete. At that point, the money is
either released to you in order to complete payment for the balance of the
renovation cost. Any excess (seriously?) would be applied to the principal of
the loan.
Seems easy, right? Not quite. In order to close on the loan,
a lot of decisions and commitments need to be made. There are things that you
wouldn’t have even thought of at this point in the process with a normal
mortgage, even if you intended to make renovations to your home. For example,
you need an architect and a contractor.
The contractor needs to be officially approved by the bank
in order to close on the loan. They need to agree to the WWU and sign it in
addition to a number of other forms and releases. They need to prove their
licensing, their financial ability to complete the work (remember, funds are
not release until progress/completion), and a number of other requirements. You
can change your contractor after closing, but to do so is another time
consuming and challenging process.
The other tricky requirement is timeline. The bank requires
you to complete the renovations in six-months. For a full gut renovation, that
is a large task! Additionally, we are in New York City. The Department of
Buildings (DOB) here is strict and attentive. You need permits for nearly every
type of job, and you have limitations to when work can be done. Since the type
of permits we need could take months to be approved, we have already spoken to
our consultant about extensions to the six-month requirement. We have been told
not to worry about it. Delays that are out of our control are not penalized.
In the end, we were eventually approved and the bank was
happy to close. However, approval from the bank is only one part of the closing
process…
Labels:
203k,
brooklyn,
FHA,
Financing,
first home,
greenpoint,
HUD,
Mortgage,
nyc,
real estate,
Renovations
Pictures of the Fixer-Upper....
While the pictures of the house in its originally purchased state do not represent a glamorous property, to us they do represent the raw potential and imagination behind our purchase. Curb appeal, updated appliances, luxury finishes, chef's kitchen... None of those real estate catch-phrases could possibly be applied to this particular address! Not to mention that the two-family configuration and drop-down ceilings makes the space feel far from spacious.
However, these pictures do serve as a fun reminder of the "before." Hopefully we survive the process (and don't run out of money!) to finally compare it to the "after."
House Hunting
I have been meaning to start this blog for a while now. Due to time constraints, lack of creativity, and overall just life interference, there was an inevitable delay. However, I'm happy to start posting now. I'll post a few entries at once to catch up to where I was with the blog "offline", but as we go forward, the blog will track our progress with our experience as first-time home-buyers and renovators.
Roughly two years ago, we began a common stage in many people’s lives: we started to look for a home to purchase and call our own. In many parts of the country, this is a rather straightforward ordeal. You visit a handful of homes, you narrow it down, and voila, you move in. For us on the other hand, this was a huge undertaking.
Roughly two years ago, we began a common stage in many people’s lives: we started to look for a home to purchase and call our own. In many parts of the country, this is a rather straightforward ordeal. You visit a handful of homes, you narrow it down, and voila, you move in. For us on the other hand, this was a huge undertaking.
Living in NYC, there was little in our price range that
matched exactly what we were looking for. We weren’t even picky: condo, co-op,
townhome, brownstone, you name it. All were in our radar. The issue was space.
We really wanted space, and maybe even a little bit of green space, and that is
a very expensive commodity in this city.
Many outside of the city would be shocked at what people are
willing to pay here, but that is a different conversation. For us it was set –
we were New Yorkers, and we were going to stay in New York. We had never owned
anything (not even a car) and this was an important next step for us.
During the course of two years, possibly one hundred open
houses in various neighborhoods of Brooklyn and Manhattan, and many
questionable statements made by real estate agents, we realized something: we
weren’t going to be happy in new construction, or even someone else’s recent renovations.
Not for the price.
We ultimately decided that a “fixer-upper” was the way to
go. Why pay the premium for someone else’s new design and detailing when you
could design your own? After all, we were in no rush to move in (the perks of a
rent-controlled apartment) and could take our time making something truly our
own.
However, even finding a fixer-upper was no easy task! Once
again, it was amazing what people were willing to pay. Understandably, re-doing
many of these properties would reward you with a beautiful home or fine
investment, but we simply did not have the cash-flow that many of these places
required. Finally the insistent search paid off and we find our house. We did
make other offers along the way but this was the one: a two-family configured,
1910-built, modest home in Greenpoint, Brooklyn that we envisioned as our
single-family, “high-end” home. It even had a backyard!
Finding the house was just the beginning….
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)